21infantry
Active member
DylanGemelli said:21infantry said:So today and Sunday are rest days for me, I feel pretty damn good this morning and the evening. I want to express to people reading this log on how this product is, we ushally like to place a tangible quality to products and the effects that they have in your performance and the way it makes you look and feel. I'm in day 16 right now, and Ill I can say is Sarms are pretty damn good to me, like newbie gains all over again. Its not AAS and I realize that I have literally seen people put years of Muscle on them in a cycle. you are not going to get that with Sarms, but you will get is improvements every week that wouldn't be possible naturally. If your satisfied with above average in strength and muscle mass and having keepable gains at a considerable faster pace then a natural and keep those gains, Sarms is probably for you.
sounds damn good to me bro! i am so glad you are seeing this an experiencing it first hand... this is one of the things i always bring up is the safety, consistency, sustainability and overall performance enhancement that makes sarms so desirable... keep up the great work!
I believe that I am in the Dylan Gemelli school of thought when it comes to PEDs in general. Solid, slow and sustainable gains with as little sloppy and bad weight gained. I was reading a log on another site, the guy in a 12 week stacked Sarms cycle put on 7.8 lbs of muscle. This was BOD tested on day 3 and 4 days later after ending his cycle. All the Sarms hatters came out in full force saying this is why Sarms suck. I pointed out that 7.8 lbs is a little over what a natural athlete can expect with on point training and diet and a few years under the bar in a year. And he isn't getting any sides, whats not to like.