Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgeareudomestic
bannednutritionRegenRx

The old GW - 501516 causes cancer myth debunked. Does this link debunk this myth for

im gonna pass on this one, there are too damn many big words it would take me 6 months to decipher this shit. lol but I do know that the amount of gw they gave to rats was way way way too much it would be like you drinking 12 weeks all in one day, so ya you gon have some problems but here is the bottom line no ones getting out of this bitch alive, so we may as well look good.
 
Okay yes, it does debunk it. But the old one is not 501516 it has another number. However the study that claims it causes tumor growth was still flawed like rock said. This study shows that neither version of GW causes an increase in the cell markers that suggest tumor growth.


Phurious Pharma Rep
[email protected]
Code JS5 for 5% off
 
25mg a day is solid for minimal problems down the line we hope . Whats the proper dose that you guys would suggest starting off with ?
 
The cancer myth was debunked from the start by having a flawed study in the first place, but yes this is just one more thing to support that GW is completely safe

Thanks for sharing bro

(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
 
25mg a day is solid for minimal problems down the line we hope . Whats the proper dose that you guys would suggest starting off with ?
Should be 20mg per day, and make sure you get it from sarmsx

(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
 
Good read! However the study is dated December 2007. And the "GW-causes-cancer" myth certainly came about much later than that... color me confused.
 
This reminds me of the "study" concluding that e-cigarettes are full of nasty chemicals like formaldehyde. It was a flawed and horribly inaccurate study so it was essentially deemed worthless as well. Anything that will take money away from big pharma is immediately discredited and ruled dangerous by the FDA. What a fucking joke.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
This reminds me of the "study" concluding that e-cigarettes are full of nasty chemicals like formaldehyde. It was a flawed and horribly inaccurate study so it was essentially deemed worthless as well. Anything that will take money away from big pharma is immediately discredited and ruled dangerous by the FDA. What a fucking joke.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Take the money ? From big pharma?
 
well you guys know and have been here long enuff that you will not find a better forum to tell you the right things to do and not to do. and that most of us here are about safety and health first and foremost and I have 100% confidence that DG nor RR would ever tell anyone to take something that was proven to be dangerous or hazardous. I mean think about it I know people that have had lung cancer and never smoked a day in their life. shit happens and can happen no matter how careful you are with what you put into your body
 
Take the money ? From big pharma?
Whenever there is a drug or device that starts gaining ground and starts taking money from pharmaceutical companies it's inevitable that studies start to pop up about how bad the drug or device is. Ultimately, big pharma and the FDA don't want to cure anything. Where's the money in that? They want to keep you refilling those overpriced prescriptions that only treat one problem yet cause 20 more.

I guess I was trying to draw a parallel between what they are doing to the e-cig business and that bullshit GW study. Same shit with marijuana. They've been stifling real marijuana studies for so long. Now that people have woken up and realized that everything that's ever been said about weed has been false we're finally finding the medical importance of marijuana. The shit cures seizures and has even been shown to possibly cure fucking cancer.

I might need a bigger tin foil hat after this post. Lol

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Whenever there is a drug or device that starts gaining ground and starts taking money from pharmaceutical companies it's inevitable that studies start to pop up about how bad the drug or device is. Ultimately, big pharma and the FDA don't want to cure anything. Where's the money in that? They want to keep you refilling those overpriced prescriptions that only treat one problem yet cause 20 more.

I guess I was trying to draw a parallel between what they are doing to the e-cig business and that bullshit GW study. Same shit with marijuana. They've been stifling real marijuana studies for so long. Now that people have woken up and realized that everything that's ever been said about weed has been false we're finally finding the medical importance of marijuana. The shit cures seizures and has even been shown to possibly cure fucking cancer.

I might need a bigger tin foil hat after this post. Lol

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

and steroids as well, the govt rep on bigger faster stronger said he will never do a study to prove that they are bad for you or not.
 
and steroids as well, the govt rep on bigger faster stronger said he will never do a study to prove that they are bad for you or not.
Exactly.

We could probably go on and on about different things.

Psychedelic mushrooms... Another good example. It's been shown to have extreme anti-depressant effects and help with PTSD. I won't incriminate myself but I've never been depressed. 😉

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
lmao and don't take this as killing the messenger OP but you will always find a study to debunk the study of any study
 
Hope we are not wrong. Why did WADA PUT OUT A WARNING . An article on the matter says this was a rate measure by WADA. Usually its a legality but this time they allegedly warned athletes that cancer was a possibility.
 
Top Bottom