GW 501516 vs SR9009

[Slip]

Is SR9009 worth it?

It is 1.5x-2x (depending on dosage) more than GW 501515 to run, with a much more Laboursome dosing protocol.

Is it 1.5-2x stronger than GW 501516? I ask this as GW501516 has already allowed me to realise huge increases in endurance/perforamance that have allowed me to increase my training volume for skill work (Better quality rounds, and more of them on mits, grappling, HIIT/Strength Training). My may interest is from a performance standpoint (high output with a high strength to weight ratio)

If it gets better than this, I am keen to check it out.

What have you experiences been contrasting both?

 

[9th Wonder]

Two different compounds all together. GW shines with respect to endurance and output.

SR shines in terms of kickstarting metabolism and helps with cutting. I love both but in terms of achieving higher levels performance output GW takes the crown.

 

[DylanGemelli]

i will always take GW over anything for pure performance enhancement... now, synergistically, stacking them will results in even more performance but if you take on or the other, gw is always going to shine more....

 

[Slip]

How much more of difference does it make when they are stacked?

 

[DylanGemelli]

How much more of difference does it make when they are stacked?

well significant because you are adding all the benefits of sr along with gw.. anytime you stack sarms, the results clearly multiply as they all bring something significant to the table