I often see differing opinions on the test:tren ratio when on cycle. Some believe you should always run tren higher than test to combat sides while others prefer to run test far higher and see to have no problems... There is actually a significant difference in opinion on this topic, so I ask all you tren users, which do you prefer and why?
I have personally always been a believer in running tren higher than test or at the minimum, equal to. I feel that with the estrogen conversion present with test, it only adds to the high probability of many sides that could occur with tren use. It may or may not happen to some but this is a decisive factor. I am actually a believer that ANY cycle should let the other compounds shine and test should do what it does best, support and be the back bone of the cycle. I never recommend nor run any type of cycle without test and believe that it is the backbone of any and every cycle however, i have never advocated nor believed in the massive test doses I have seen ran on may occasions. That does not mean that is true for everyone or every circumstance by any means whatsoever.. That is MY stance on it but I already know there are plenty of arguments in the other favor and that is completely fine... That is what makes this beautiful for all of us... We can see and learn from one another on different methods and protocols. I learn something new every day and find new reasoning and science to back up things I may have been against before. An open mind is the key here but it is also good to provide each of our own insight and reasoning to compare and learn, not argue... Often times I see too many people get too sensitive or quick to react, and I have been guilty of this in the past... The KEY here is for EVERYONE to provide their own insight, compare, learn and maybe even try another method... I have been wrong a million times and have openly admitted it when I see a better way... It is just great to share and learn and I hope we can all do that together!
That being said, WHAT IS YOUR METHOD??
I have personally always been a believer in running tren higher than test or at the minimum, equal to. I feel that with the estrogen conversion present with test, it only adds to the high probability of many sides that could occur with tren use. It may or may not happen to some but this is a decisive factor. I am actually a believer that ANY cycle should let the other compounds shine and test should do what it does best, support and be the back bone of the cycle. I never recommend nor run any type of cycle without test and believe that it is the backbone of any and every cycle however, i have never advocated nor believed in the massive test doses I have seen ran on may occasions. That does not mean that is true for everyone or every circumstance by any means whatsoever.. That is MY stance on it but I already know there are plenty of arguments in the other favor and that is completely fine... That is what makes this beautiful for all of us... We can see and learn from one another on different methods and protocols. I learn something new every day and find new reasoning and science to back up things I may have been against before. An open mind is the key here but it is also good to provide each of our own insight and reasoning to compare and learn, not argue... Often times I see too many people get too sensitive or quick to react, and I have been guilty of this in the past... The KEY here is for EVERYONE to provide their own insight, compare, learn and maybe even try another method... I have been wrong a million times and have openly admitted it when I see a better way... It is just great to share and learn and I hope we can all do that together!
That being said, WHAT IS YOUR METHOD??
