Supercut 450
- Thread starter urlomes
- Start date
i am not a fan of blends whatsoever and especially when its a mix of this much... i would NEVER run anything like that nor advise it... what are your stats? age/height/weight/body fat? cycle history????? goals from the cycle???
I don't like blends and especially not highly concentrated blends like that.
What is your stats and experience?
(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
The compounds are wonderful, but as stated above and in one of my previous posts- blends look great on paper, but the practical application is flawed. Those doses far exceed what's needed and have the potential for more harm than good unless used by an experienced AAS user. I'm willing to bet this blend was priced around $140... blends, unless concocted by the actual user IMO are stupid and merely a sales pitch aimed at moving a few dollars worth of gear in a high priced fashion.
Provide stats please...
Provide stats please...
C
cbbram00
Guest
What are your stats and cycle history? Please DO NOT use this for a first cycle. You're better off seeing how your body responds to single ester compounds. This looks like a train wreck waiting to happen.
While you guys are on the topic, do you mind if I interject here and ask... What is the benefit of having mixes? Doesn't it mean you're pretty much committed to a fixed ratio? Why not do it yourself, it would only take an extra minute, anyways.
Am I missing something? What's the appeal of these mixes?
Am I missing something? What's the appeal of these mixes?
TIN MAN
Member
Doesn't that just mean that you're solution is more concentrated? Is that a positive?
Most definitely... as I stated above predetermined ratio's of compounds are stupid at best unless someone essentially does it themselves to fit their cycle needs. Cookie cutter blends are for the folks easily enamored with shiny objects, bells and whistles.
Honestly the only benefit there is to it is cutting down on oil volume. That's literally the only thing
(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
Typical tren doses are in the area of 75mg per day the different esters in this mix all have different half lives and pinning schedules based on the esters. Here's a caveman's summation:
Trenbolone Acetate-injectable version (Finaject and Finajet) A lot of folks call this "Fina." Finaject is the acetate form of trenbolone. It's a short acting ester (acetate), so its effect lasts only a short time and frequent pins are necessary.
Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate (or Parabolan)
Parabolan contains a much different ester than Finaject and Finajet, called Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate. This ester extends the activity of trenbolone for more than two weeks, which is more suitable for human use.
Trenbolone Hexahydrobenzylcarbonate- (also called Parabolan quite a bit) Trenbolone Hexahydrobenzylcarbonate and Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate are exactly the same. The Hexahydrobenzylcarbonate ester is just another name for cyclohexylmethylcarbonate ester.
Trenbolone Enanthate- even though it's very similar, this isn't the same as Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate (Trenbolone Hexahydrobenzylcarbonate). The only difference is the esters.
The amount of trenbolone in 76 mg of Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate is equal to the amount of trenbolone in only 58 mg of Trenbolone Acetate. The acetate version is more potent and more effective per milligram because the ester is lighter than the cyclohexylmethylcarbonate ester. Meaning a higher percentage of the weight of Trenbolone Acetate is actual trenbolone. Similar comparison also can be made with the other long lasting esters of trenbolone: enanthate and hexahydrobenzylcarbonate.
Actual active hormone per ester for Trenbolone:
Trenbolone Base: 100mg
Trenbolone Acetate: 83mg
Trenbolone Enanthate: 68mg
Trenbolone Hexahydrobenzyl Carbonate: 65mg
Trenbolone Cyclohexylmethylcarbonate: 65mg
So the determining factor is this... how many times a week do you want to pin, and how fast you want to see results. So that mix above has one short ester and two long esters. If this is your first experience with tren and you get sides in a bad way, it sucks to be you as this will take a few weeks to clear out. Safe mans bet... acetate version till you know if you can handle it.
Last edited:
It's just easier to use, less vials to draw from and less oil. And no your not committed to a fixed dose because you are not restricted to only using the "mix" preparation you can add anything you would like to the mix. Most people usually dilute mixes using testosterone, deca, EQ, or a steroid that may cut down on pip and compliment the cycle.
That being said I'd question the legitimacy of the product mentioned by the OP, considering the raws used to produce a mix of that magnitude would be very expensive and probably would not attract many users.
that was my issue with it as well brother... that mix would be very very high end and more difficult to produce especially with accuracy.. i wouldnt even consider it...
here's a prime example of why i dont like them... one of the most common is test/tren/masteron... its normally 100 each but thats way too low for masteron... you dont get the right ratios... like if eq or primo were in there, they need to be ran much higher and it just fucks things up... i like to do things traditional and have them on point so i'll just stick with doing it the way i do it... dont fix whats not broke... =)
Similar threads
