Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • -->
napsgeareudomestic
bannednutritionRegenRx

Stacking EQ

They say you start getting the results from EQ around 8 weeks. Why not run test/eq for 20 weeks and bring Tren in later in the cycle say 10 weeks so you can catch the benefits of test and eq early on and when the eq starts coming in hard you bump it to another level with tren.

More of a question I guess? Would that work or is it just not smart for some reason?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 
They say you start getting the results from EQ around 8 weeks. Why not run test/eq for 20 weeks and bring Tren in later in the cycle say 10 weeks so you can catch the benefits of test and eq early on and when the eq starts coming in hard you bump it to another level with tren.

More of a question I guess? Would that work or is it just not smart for some reason?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

I don't know how I feel about having Tren on the backend though.. Not to say it's not a great idea, cause I've never tried it. The gains are so massive with Tren, and it's such a complete transformation of the body, in my mind it makes more sense to have it on the front end. Reason being that you have more of an opportunity to solidify those big gains that you got from Tren, because you still have 13 more weeks of EQ which is know for the clean keep able gains.

Maybe my thought process is flawed.. I would def like to hear others thoughts. Another thought is Tren is so harsh anyways, it seems like recovery would be cleaner and more optimal too if you did the Tren up front cause EQ is so mild.
 
They say you start getting the results from EQ around 8 weeks. Why not run test/eq for 20 weeks and bring Tren in later in the cycle say 10 weeks so you can catch the benefits of test and eq early on and when the eq starts coming in hard you bump it to another level with tren.

More of a question I guess? Would that work or is it just not smart for some reason?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

I'm doing that sorta with this cycle only I started tren at 50mg a week and I'll bump it up to 100-150 at the 8 week mark.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Www.expressdomesticapache.com

[email protected]
 
I don't know how I feel about having Tren on the backend though.. Not to say it's not a great idea, cause I've never tried it. The gains are so massive with Tren, and it's such a complete transformation of the body, in my mind it makes more sense to have it on the front end. Reason being that you have more of an opportunity to solidify those big gains that you got from Tren, because you still have 13 more weeks of EQ which is know for the clean keep able gains.

Maybe my thought process is flawed.. I would def like to hear others thoughts. Another thought is Tren is so harsh anyways, it seems like recovery would be cleaner and more optimal too if you did the Tren up front cause EQ is so mild.
That makes total sense to me too.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 
Actually it makes perfect sense to finish a cycle with tren. For anyone that understands myosyatin, and its effects on halting muscle gain, it's commonly known that gains will stall at some point in a cycle. In order to overcome that, you must increase the amount of androgens in the body by increasing doses, or introducing a more anabolic compound....and there is nothing stronger or better than Tren for this. For that reason, tren is an awesome finisher to continue making gains where they would have normally stalked otherwise.

Starting off a cycle with tren isn't a bad idea, but once gains stall you've already put your biggest player on the field and there's nothing else to use to further make gains from that point
 
They say you start getting the results from EQ around 8 weeks. Why not run test/eq for 20 weeks and bring Tren in later in the cycle say 10 weeks so you can catch the benefits of test and eq early on and when the eq starts coming in hard you bump it to another level with tren.

More of a question I guess? Would that work or is it just not smart for some reason?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

you can definitely do this... i never run eq less than 20 weeks and its completely fine to finish out with tren... i would rather finish with winstrol myself but you can also do it this way if your intent..
 
Top Bottom