Sarm Capsules

[CobraMuscle]

There are more and more companies releasing sarms in capsules and less in liquid. I will always stick with PE but I'm just curious on why capsules aren't as effective as the liquids. I see a lot of members saying that capsules aren't as effective as the liquid. Any proof or evidence to back that up?

 

[DylanGemelli]

There are more and more companies releasing sarms in capsules and less in liquid. I will always stick with PE but I'm just curious on why capsules aren't as effective as the liquids. I see a lot of members saying that capsules aren't as effective as the liquid. Any proof or evidence to back that up?

Yes, there is plenty... show me ONE study that ever used sarms in a capsule form? they don't, they never did and they never will... why? you get 20% bioavailability if your luck in a capsule where you get 90-99% in liquid (depending on the quality and methods or production)... sarms are illegal to sell in capsule form as they can only be sold as research chemicals... many companies put pro hormones or other additives in them... people are not having any sort of true sarms experience, experiencing strange side effects, none of the normalcies congruent with sarms use... if you get a gram of powder of testostone, masteron, etc... would you throw it in a cap... of course not... that's not how its supposed to be used... you wouldn't have any bioavailability that way etc... its a fucking joke and marketing scheme... its a lot easier and cheaper to mass produce capsules and bottle them etc. than to do liquid as well... far cheaper... its all a ploy for money because o f the prohormone issue...

 

[RickRock]

Re: RE: Sarm Capsules

There are more and more companies releasing sarms in capsules and less in liquid. I will always stick with PE but I'm just curious on why capsules aren't as effective as the liquids. I see a lot of members saying that capsules aren't as effective as the liquid. Any proof or evidence to back that up?

A lot of the companies capping sarms are t even putting sarms in them, and putting PHs in there or something else instead. That's the only way they can get real results out of their caps, so that should tell you something

 

[RickRock]

Re: RE: Sarm Capsules

There are more and more companies releasing sarms in capsules and less in liquid. I will always stick with PE but I'm just curious on why capsules aren't as effective as the liquids. I see a lot of members saying that capsules aren't as effective as the liquid. Any proof or evidence to back that up?

A lot of the companies capping sarms are t even putting sarms in them, and putting PHs in there or something else instead. That's the only way they can get real results out of their caps, so that should tell you something

 

[kylebu]

Re: RE: Sarm Capsules

There are more and more companies releasing sarms in capsules and less in liquid. I will always stick with PE but I'm just curious on why capsules aren't as effective as the liquids. I see a lot of members saying that capsules aren't as effective as the liquid. Any proof or evidence to back that up?

A lot of the companies capping sarms are t even putting sarms in them, and putting PHs in there or something else instead. That's the only way they can get real results out of their caps, so that should tell you something

kind of a buzzkill...so centurion labz / chem tek you dont think are legit sarms even if they just simply arent as bioavailable? youre pretty convinced such companies are putting out prohormones marketed as sarms as well as their new pro hormone line?

 

[21infantry]

Dude why would you buy something that cost as much as the real deal and delivers about a 4th of the results? And if you do make gains its not because of Sarms but left over Pro Hormone stock. You keep on asking the same question over and over again hopeing that the answer will change. Simply put buy some liquid sarms and not from Sarms 1, but anybody else.

Here are some companies that sell liquid Sarms,

Pure Essence young company building a good reputation
SarmsSearch probably the longest running company with a great reputation but exspensive as hell
Southern Sarms hit or miss logs and reviews
Sarms1 from my understanding was once a great Sarms maker but went to shit in the last year stay away
Uniquechemicals some swear by them, one of the cheaper makers out there. Buddy swears by them, reviews are hit and miss

 

[kylebu]

Dude why would you buy something that cost as much as the real deal and delivers about a 4th of the results? And if you do make gains its not because of Sarms but left over Pro Hormone stock. You keep on asking the same question over and over again hopeing that the answer will change. Simply put buy some liquid sarms and not from Sarms 1, but anybody else.

Here are some companies that sell liquid Sarms,

Pure Essence young company building a good reputation
SarmsSearch probably the longest running company with a great reputation but exspensive as hell
Southern Sarms hit or miss logs and reviews
Sarms1 from my understanding was once a great Sarms maker but went to shit in the last year stay away
Uniquechemicals some swear by them, one of the cheaper makers out there. Buddy swears by them, reviews are hit and miss

alright thanks for the help, didnt realize it was you in both threads lmao my fault.

 

[TexasTrash]

I want to preface this by saying that Im not disagreeing with any of the previously posted statements.

That being said, with all this talk of clinical testing of SARM using pills/capsules or liquid suspensions I figured Id look into it a little and see info what I can find from drug companies. In short, I chose 2 SARMS randomly (MK-2866 & GW-501516 [yes I know you may not necessarily consider the latter a true SARM]) and did a little searching. I found that in nearly all the studies there was no mention of liquid or capsule. In the 2 summaries I saw that mentioned how they administered the compound they were both in pill/capsule form...........Glaxosmith Kline with GW-501516 & GTx with MK-2866. I disregarded any info that was not from drug/research companies. Am I missing something here??

Again, I dont disagree with the statement that liquid form is more effective, but like a few people have posted, where is the proof of this? As further proof that Im not making the argument FOR pill/capsule form, Ill mention that my lab rat is 1 week into a 12 week SUPER STACK cycle form PE and so far the results are quite promising. So, yes I like the liquid form..............and based on the last 7 days, yes I would recommend PE.

For those people wondering where I got my info, here are the links:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/2 ... etXYRFViko
http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.co ... w501516#ps

Any thoughts?

 

[RickRock]

I want to preface this by saying that Im not disagreeing with any of the previously posted statements.

That being said, with all this talk of clinical testing of SARM using pills/capsules or liquid suspensions I figured Id look into it a little and see info what I can find from drug companies. In short, I chose 2 SARMS randomly (MK-2866 & GW-501516 [yes I know you may not necessarily consider the latter a true SARM]) and did a little searching. I found that in nearly all the studies there was no mention of liquid or capsule. In the 2 summaries I saw that mentioned how they administered the compound they were both in pill/capsule form...........Glaxosmith Kline with GW-501516 & GTx with MK-2866. I disregarded any info that was not from drug/research companies. Am I missing something here??

Again, I dont disagree with the statement that liquid form is more effective, but like a few people have posted, where is the proof of this? As further proof that Im not making the argument FOR pill/capsule form, Ill mention that my lab rat is 1 week into a 12 week SUPER STACK cycle form PE and so far the results are quite promising. So, yes I like the liquid form..............and based on the last 7 days, yes I would recommend PE.

For those people wondering where I got my info, here are the links:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/2 ... etXYRFViko
http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.co ... w501516#ps

Any thoughts?

ALL studies are done by liquid bro. That's common knowledge, because rats don't take pills lol. When administering "research chemicals" to animals they are ALWAYS given by an oral syringe filled with the compound in alcohol suspension.