There is nothing I can really accomplish with tren thay I can't with deca.Can one of you experienced users compare the two. From what I have gathered is tren is better at strength, hardness, fat melting. Decca at size and sides is this correct? Also if ran moderately Decca is far from wet but not tren like.
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk
Reason why I don't always use tren with my cycles is cause I just prefer deca for what I do mostly.
Tren is for sure going to be a lot stronger but the sides man just make you miserable. Say you run 16 weeks of deca. Well if you run 16 weeks of tren chances are you will be hurttin bad.
Just no reason for a lot of dudes to go the tren route.
Only time Im touching it, will be for prep. Wich I'm actually starting in Feb. But I usually keep it fairly low till the very last part of it all.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk