Hi Koda. I have done a lot of study and personal use of peptides over the years. IMO to do it right you need a solid source (very hard to find) and you need to run it for a while. The results are minimal and quite frankly I am now a believer that the SARMs and Sarm style growth secrete products are far superior. Here is my reasoning: they do not require a complicated process of lypholizing the peptides for use, SARMs are bio available (taken by mouth) which mean no extra pinning. I have personally enjoyed my results from SARMs (when I say this I am including GW and MK677) when pared with AAS over any peptide run I have done. Honestly, if I just had money falling out of me then maybe I would run peptides... but even then I’m not so sure of the value given the extra storage, pinning and extra cost around just using them.
Now running real deal GH will always trump any peptide you could ever run but then you are not using your own bodies GH.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk