Ok this is my second post call me silly or uneducated why would someone opt to use steroids over sarms given that sarms supposedly have much less or no effects on the liver or kidneys? (Be interested to know peoples blood results or experiences after sarms)
As someone whos looking to source some sarms for a first time cycle I'm curious to know opinions/facts on this subject.
Are we basically saying steroids are just that much more effective and sarms aren't worth it or is it a case we don't know enough about the long term effects of sarms because they aren't as well documented as actual steroids? I understand both causes suppression and need a PCT but most steroids causes all sorts of problems on the kidney and liver where as most forums/people online/boards seem to think sarms only causes issue if they are fake or mis labelled products.
I've used Dbol and Anavar in the past and due to my medical issues had to stop but I still feel sarms are a path I'd like to try and could be an option for me. I understand sarms are still very experimental compounds.
As someone whos looking to source some sarms for a first time cycle I'm curious to know opinions/facts on this subject.
Are we basically saying steroids are just that much more effective and sarms aren't worth it or is it a case we don't know enough about the long term effects of sarms because they aren't as well documented as actual steroids? I understand both causes suppression and need a PCT but most steroids causes all sorts of problems on the kidney and liver where as most forums/people online/boards seem to think sarms only causes issue if they are fake or mis labelled products.
I've used Dbol and Anavar in the past and due to my medical issues had to stop but I still feel sarms are a path I'd like to try and could be an option for me. I understand sarms are still very experimental compounds.