Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are being ridiculous. You dont have to run a "huge test cycle" or a "test and tren cycle" for your first time. If you weren't so damn hardheaded and you actually listened to reason with those who are trying to help you then you would see that NONE of that is recommended here for a first cycle.Well, there are steroids that are more androgenic and more likely to cause androgenic side effects and steroids which are less androgenic and not as likely to cause androgenic side effects. Deca and turinabol are not very androgenic and you are in fact more likely to get androgenic side effects from a bigger test-only cycle than from the low-dose test cycle I'm proposing. This is not bro science, this is actual science.
The difference being that if I can keep my hair till 35, I'll choose that instead of going on a huge cycle with test and tren to speed that process and lose much of my hair in a year or two.
Yes. It's not as bad as for some and not really that noticeable (yet), but I can tell how my hairline has receded over the years.
"Huge" is subjective and what I consider "huge" might be a small, mild or high dose for some of you regulars, as you correctly put it.If you asked us we would tell you to run test enan or test cyp anywhere between 250-500mg depending on your goals. 500 being at the very high end for a first cycle, still is not where near a "huge" dose.
I'm compensating with deca for the low test dosage, i.e., deca will be the primary steroid responsible for muscle building. As you all know, there are people who do downright idiotic cycles with orals only and no test base, or even tren/deca with no test base, and they still gain muscle and keep some of them after PCT. I'm not that stupid, even though some of the posters above want to believe so, so whereas I won't inject excessive test into my body to get me over the natty range of 1,200+ ng/dl, I won't be at 0 ng/dl either, but somewhere around my natural levels. So if people who go on stupid cycles without any test base gain muscle and keep some afterwards, why is my plan to use a minimal amount of test just to keep me in the normal range looked down upon so much, as if I won't be able to build and keep any muscle at all?And at that dosage you'd be better off taking nothing.
I mean turinabol, I wouldn't use d-bol because it's more androgenic and not friendly to the hairline, not to mention I don't really want much water bloat. But yea, might not waste money on it for the first time...Now I'm assuming you meant d-bol? Or turinabol?
You are probably an exception. Most people would be nowhere near that range with 100 mg per week, that's why TRT doses start at 125 mg and might go up to 250 mg, and even then they still aren't in the upper natural levels of 1000 ng/dl but in the averages of 600 ng/dl (or even lower) - that's what a TRT is supposed to do, put your testosterone in the average healthy range. Almost nobody pins that small of a dose precisely because almost nobody gets their testosterone that high because of it, you know very well this is true. And besides, if I'm an exception too, I can always take a blood test to determine how much my testosterone has elevated (if at all) and pin less next time.I have tens of bloodwork results showing 1000ng/dL on 100mg per week
I'm here for feedback, whether positive, negative or of a curious nature, and also to learn and discuss. I'm sure I'm not the only person who has considered taking steroids but was reluctant due to the potential androgenic side effects such as hair loss. Someone just like me might come across this forum thread by googling the same thing next week, month, year, etc., and hopefully get something out of it, not just bro science. In this regard, I'll also leave a useful link here: http://www.hairlossfromsteroids.com/Specific-Steroids-and-Hair-Loss.htmlso wtf are you doing here...really?
Because it sure isn't to learn anything
You are an exception then. That's why TRT doses start at 125 mg and go up to 250 mg, and even then the men aren't usually in the upper levels with 1000 ng/dl, but in the averages of 600 (or even lower) - that's what TRT is supposed to do, put your testosterone in the healthy average range. Almost nobody pins such a small dose of test precisely because almost nobody gets their testosterone that high because of it, and you know very well this is true, and others agree as well. I might as well be an exception, but I can always do a blood test to see how much my testosterone has elevated (if at all) and pin less next time.I have tens of bloodwork results showing 1000ng/dL on 100mg per week
I'm here for feedback, whether positive, negative or of a curious nature, and also to discuss and learn. I'm sure I'm not the only person on earth who has considered taking steroids but was reluctant due to the androgenic side effects such as hair loss. Someone like me might google and find this forum thread in a week, month, year, etc., and hopefully get something out of it, not just bro science.so wtf are you doing here...really?
Because it sure isn't to learn anything
Those come with their own side effects, finasteride/dutasteride being terrible in this regard and I'd never use them or recommend to anyone, ever. Minoxidil is a no-go for me either, first because of the initial Minoxidil-induced shedding and second because you have to be on the stuff forever. Once I lose enough hair I'll shave it off, no problem, but if someone really wants their hair for that long, I'd recommend it. Then there's also RU-58841, unresearched and unknown side effects, might be the same as finasteride, also expensive.So, the weird cycle aside, your main issue is dht right? Why not run some serious hair loss prevention on cycle and just run the normal test only first cycle? If you're just beginning hair loss, there are so many topical dht inhibitor's and shampoos and ect...
You are an exception then. That's why TRT doses start at 125 mg and go up to 250 mg, and even then the men aren't usually in the upper levels with 1000 ng/dl, but in the averages of 600 (or even lower) - that's what TRT is supposed to do, put your testosterone in the healthy average range. Almost nobody pins such a small dose of test precisely because almost nobody gets their testosterone that high because of it, and you know very well this is true, and others agree as well. I might as well be an exception, but I can always do a blood test to see how much my testosterone has elevated (if at all) and pin less next time.
I was wrong in saying TRT starts at 125 mg and goes up to 250 mg (I read that somewhere but didn't double-check it), but there are lots of people on TRT who are prescribed 150-200 mg per week, which is 50-100 mg more than this guideline recommends, and they were initially put on 100 mg.TRT doses do not start at 125mg...and no clinical protocol calls for 250mmg per week
ALL major professional Endocrinology Societies and Organizations worldwide recommend a starting dose for TESTOSTERONE E or C at... 150- 200mg EVERY 2 WEEKS (75-100mg per week)
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/jc.2009-2354
see table 6....Clinical pharmacology of some testosterone formulations
That's the standard protocol...PERIOD
Adjustments are then made UP or DOWN to achieve serum testosterone levels between 350 and 750 ng/dl 1 wk after the injection
I'll have to do more research into RU-58841, but if this is true, it means one can use higher amounts of test (e.g. an average cycle, not the small one I'm proposing) and experience no hair loss (at areas where RU was applied, as it literally blocks DHT from affecting those hair follicles). Interesting.I agree on most of what you're saying regarding fina/duta being too dangerous, and the hastle of minoxidl. However, RU-58841 is topical and can't enter the bloodstream, therefore systemic sides are impossible. There have been trials since 2008, and volunteers' only side effect has been minor irritation after application.
I personally have a friend who was thinning bad, he started running this stuff and he doesn't even shed on tren/winny so take that as you will.
Seems like my reply got deleted because I added a link. I'll write it again without the link:
You are an exception then. That's why TRT doses start at 125 mg and go up to 250 mg, and even then the men aren't usually in the upper levels with 1000 ng/dl, but in the averages of 600 (or even lower) - that's what TRT is supposed to do, put your testosterone in the healthy average range. Almost nobody pins such a small dose of test precisely because almost nobody gets their testosterone that high because of it, and you know very well this is true, and others agree as well. I might as well be an exception, but I can always do a blood test to see how much my testosterone has elevated (if at all) and pin less next time.
I'm here for feedback, whether positive, negative or of a curious nature, and also to discuss and learn. I'm sure I'm not the only person on earth who has considered taking steroids but was reluctant due to the androgenic side effects such as hair loss. Someone like me might google and find this forum thread in a week, month, year, etc., and hopefully get something out of it, not just bro science.
guideline...75-100mg per week....I was wrong in saying TRT starts at 125 mg and goes up to 250 mg (I read that somewhere but didn't double-check it), but there are lots of people on TRT who are prescribed 150-200 mg per week, which is 50-100 mg more than this guideline recommends, and they were initially put on 100 mg.
And yet, they still do. 75-100 mg is prescribed because it raises testosterone on average up to 350-750 ng/dl, as per the guideline you linked. Rarely, like in your case, it raises it to 1000 ng/dl. If this was the norm, the standard protocol would be lower. See also:guideline...75-100mg per week....
150-200mg is double the guideline
very few endo's ever prescribe 200mg per week...
A rule of thumb is 6x dosage test for pharma grade, some folks use 7. So even 200mg weekly should net at least 1100.
You mean from people with experience with TRT and steroids, just like you? Lol...your "knowledge" on the subject (as already proved) comes from BB forums...
Good to know, so I should change the topic title from "70-125 mg" to "50-125 mg." Thanks.FWI...more men (when under the care of a qualified endocrinologists) are prescribed 50mg/week than 150mg
My math is fine.you can't even do simple math...
Which part of it is bullshit, other than the part where I wrongly assumed standard TRT doses are 125-250 mg per week? Are you claiming I won't build any muscle with average 700 ng/dl testosterone while using deca or what exactly you arguing here?so..just move along...head in sand..do your "researched" cycle...see for yourself...but plz stop posting your BS "knowledge"..you do a disservice to those here actually wanting to obtain real information