Hi,
So here's the short story, I completed a quick "dirty" bulk where I put on fat too quickly. I'm now at around 17% BF.
Trying to reduce my BF a bit now so I could bulk properly again and I'd prefer not to do 2 separate cycles for this (i.e cutting stack then bulking stack).
What is the optimum way on going about this to put on muscle:
1) would it be better to first cut down to say 12% BF first, reverse diet, then bulk with LGD/S4;
2) would it be quicker to just stack them right now at a calorie defecit to reduce body fat and put likely put less muscle size?
3) theoretically speaking and having regard to the 2 options above, what can I expect in terms of muscle gains between the two options using LGD/S4 ( i.e 12 week cycle straight bulk vs. 12 week cycle 500 cal defecit ? )
So here's the short story, I completed a quick "dirty" bulk where I put on fat too quickly. I'm now at around 17% BF.
Trying to reduce my BF a bit now so I could bulk properly again and I'd prefer not to do 2 separate cycles for this (i.e cutting stack then bulking stack).
What is the optimum way on going about this to put on muscle:
1) would it be better to first cut down to say 12% BF first, reverse diet, then bulk with LGD/S4;
2) would it be quicker to just stack them right now at a calorie defecit to reduce body fat and put likely put less muscle size?
3) theoretically speaking and having regard to the 2 options above, what can I expect in terms of muscle gains between the two options using LGD/S4 ( i.e 12 week cycle straight bulk vs. 12 week cycle 500 cal defecit ? )