Hgh

[teku135]

I have a few questions about hgh. I want to use hgh after pct to help maintain my gains and help maintain a low body fat. After i get off hgh, will i need a special pct for hgh, so my natural gh goes back to normal? or will i need to stay on hgh forever like trt? Are hgh injections intramuscular or can they be injected into fat?

 

[MarkR]

What age are you? A lot of members will comment and suggest that HGH is mostly beneficial for users 30+

HGH can be injected both intramuscular and subcutaneous (into muscle and into fat) most common approach is subcutaneous injections into the stomach.

HGH is as far as I'm aware non suppressive of your natural GH production, therefor no PCT should be required.

Lastly, HGH is very expensive (particularly pharm grade). A more cost effective and possibly more beneficial approach would be a SARMS bridge.

I personally when finished PCT will be giving a SARMS bridge a try, other members can hopefully chime in on what they feel is best option for this purpose (GH vs SARMS)

 

[teku135]

How do sarms compare to hgh for fat burning? I saw some stories online that hgh can make one lean without any diet or cardio. It sounds too good to be true, but that is one of the reasons i want to try it out. I stick to the same diet year round and i do cardio 3-4 times a week, so that should not be a problem.

 

[MarkR]

I would imagine with a clean diet, and proper cardio and training, you would see results with SARMS first.

Check out SR9009 on this site - https://www.isarms.com/stenabolic-sr9009

"Stenabolic has the ability to alter the activity of the skeletal muscle mitochondria, or in simple terms – it boosts your metabolic activity. This makes it similar to what DNP does, being SR9009 much safer and not counter productive to your endurance goals. What’s more, unlike DNP, SR9009 has the ability to mimic actual aerobic exercise without actually putting in the conditioning. Therefore, it will boost your endurance instead of hurting it."

We are literally in the same position right now, PCT is looming and all we want is to keep getting lean and keep building muscle!

Hopefully Dylan / Rick or any other member who has been down this route can chime in soon and advise on HGH vs SARMS, or maybe even a combination?

 

[MarkR]

Also, if you feel like checking out the SARMS bridge i was recommended, its as follows -

1-12 rad140 20 mg day dosed once a day in the a.m.
1-12 sr9009 30 mg day... 5 mg split doses 2-3 hours apart
1-12 S4 50 mg day... split doses... 25 mg in the a.m. and 25 mg in the p.m.
1-12 GW-510516 20 mg day… dosed all at once 30 minutes before workout…
1-12 mk-2866 25 mg day dosed once a day in the a.m. "

its the enhanced super stack plus MK-2886

 

[Iwannagofaster]

How do sarms compare to hgh for fat burning? I saw some stories online that hgh can make one lean without any diet or cardio. It sounds too good to be true, but that is one of the reasons i want to try it out. I stick to the same diet year round and i do cardio 3-4 times a week, so that should not be a problem.

I think that SR9009 and GW are better for burning fat. They start working very quickly. The fat burning effects of GH take several months to even begin. I would definitely go with SR and GW over GH if fat loss is your main objective. Cardio, diet, SR, GW will equal weight loss.

Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk

 

[DylanGemelli]

you need to understand that hgh is not used in the manner your looking... i really dont believe this is a good option for you... chances are high you will see water retention and bloat with hgh and it wont act in the manner your hoping nor with the speed your wanting... its not what your thinking... sarms are perfect for what your wanting... Mark gave you a good layout... here it is in its entirety... all products can be bought at www.sarmsx.com That's where you will get the best quality possible...

 

[PHURIOUS]

Ya i agree. Hgh isnt a magical injections. It will help u maintain the fat u are at and give u a gernerap state of well being. But maintaining muscle and keeping lean are based on your strict diet and intense training post cycle.


PHURIOUS

 

[DylanGemelli]

I think that SR9009 and GW are better for burning fat. They start working very quickly. The fat burning effects of GH take several months to even begin. I would definitely go with SR and GW over GH if fat loss is your main objective. Cardio, diet, SR, GW will equal weight loss.

Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk

i definitely agree with these being a far better option when it comes to fat burning and the intended goal here