Bridging with SARMS
- Thread starter admods
- Start date
actually, they all have muscle maintenance qualities, some more so than others... can be more specific about your goals... like, do you want to recomp and go for more size while dropping body fat? more of a cut? you have to be more specific..
Well I would look to do a bulk cycle most of the time and only sometimes do a cutting cycle. So I guess I'd like SARMS that would help add on size.
i would start with the power stack... that will be perfect for what your wanting to accomplish... here are the links for everything you need followed by the layout...
https://www.sarmsx.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=134&search=power
https://www.sarmsx.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=138&search=mini
1-12 rad140 20 mg day dosed once a day in the a.m.
1-12 lgd-4033 10 mg day dosed once a day in the a.m.
1-12 S4 50 mg day... split doses... 25 mg in the a.m. and 25 mg 4-6 hours later
9-12 d aspartic acid
Mini pct 13-16
clomid 50/25/25/25
gw-501516 20 mg day
Can I use Nolva instead of Clomid?
I recently read that bridging is horrible for the hpta since you would basically be starting another cycle right after pct not allowing your hormones to balance out... causing a "yoyo" effect withe the hpta. I would personally go with the non suppressive sarms like mk677 and gw for bridging. Would like to hear Dylan's thoughts on this theory because I've cancelled my original lgd/s4 bridge plans after reading about this.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
Given that sarms don't carry the suppression of steroids, I don't see it being an issue at all myself. You don't get shutdown like you would on a typical cycle which is why I think they work so well during a bridge. I think they work quite well between cycles and don't see a a problem using them in that fashion. A mini pct is always ran afterwards as well
You can use Nolva but Clomid is proffered. It is going to be a little better for recovery purposes
i dont know where you "heard" that but that's bull shit bro.. you know how many bridges ive done, ive recommended that have been done etc and there are never issues coming up whatsoever with bloods, recovery etc... that's just someone doing what they normally do out there... causing problems because they have a vendetta... sorry but that's not flying... its not even close to true... im FAR too experienced in this to have that shit come up... thats absurd
@RickRock that was my belief as well, but after seeing some users bloodwork here on lgd/rad140 and their total test being suppressed pretty substantially I'm having second thoughts... now ostarine I can definitely see being used no problem as its relatively mild, but im just not so sure how the more suppressive sarms would affect recovery.
@DylanGemelli thanks for the input bro wanted to hear your personal use and experience with sarms used in between cycles. Reason I was concerned is I've seen bloodwork showing lgd to be more suppressive than previously thought. I've bridged with ostarine before and recovered perfectly fine, but lgd/s4 I'm just not so sure if it's a good idea now... but I trust your advice more than the other source where I heard this information since you have more experience and knowledge about sarms. So I'm good to run lgd/s4 after my pct? Have a mini pct planned of clomid 50/50/25/25 then plan to take at least 4-6 weeks off after that.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
@DylanGemelli thanks for the input bro wanted to hear your personal use and experience with sarms used in between cycles. Reason I was concerned is I've seen bloodwork showing lgd to be more suppressive than previously thought. I've bridged with ostarine before and recovered perfectly fine, but lgd/s4 I'm just not so sure if it's a good idea now... but I trust your advice more than the other source where I heard this information since you have more experience and knowledge about sarms. So I'm good to run lgd/s4 after my pct? Have a mini pct planned of clomid 50/50/25/25 then plan to take at least 4-6 weeks off after that.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
for sure bro and im glad you posted for sure... lets put it this way... you should always be aware and do bloods because ultimately, regardless of what something is supposed to do or generally does, i have seen far crazier shit happen, which im sure you and everyone else has too but i can tell you with certainty, thats not true but here's the main problem bro... with all the bull shit that has happened the past year or so with prohormones being sold as sarms, of course people are going to have skewed values and question things and i personally dont blame them... how could you right? i would not recommend them if they were causing that kind of issue... we have been doing sarms bridges for over 5 years now bro... nothing like this has been an issue... its not some new concept or anything... this has been done too long and then all of a sudden these fucking clowns pull this shady shit with their products and then give sarms a bad name... its a trickle down effect and its bull shit...
Absolutely. I personally believe sarms are perfect for bridging even though they are suppressive and can slightly alter lipids... the recovery seems to be very easy post cycle. I'll continue as planned with the lgd/s4 bridge and get bloods afterwards just to be sure everything went as planned.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
sounds good brother... let me know how it goes and keep us updated on your results throughout!
